APHC010590852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30578/2025 Between: 1. VARANASI VENKATA SRIRAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, S/O. RAGHAVA SARMA, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.404, MANAS HEIGHTS, LAXMIPURAM COLONY, KUSHAIGUDA, SECUNDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHARA PRADESH. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SANTHANUTHALAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT SUB REGISTRAR, SANTHANUTHALAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 5. VARANASI RAMGOPALA SASTRY, S/O. CHANDRADHAR, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. VARANASI VARI VEEDI, R/O.7-152(1), PERNAMITTA, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High 2 Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 and 3 in not mutating my name in revenue records an extent of Ac. 0.92 cents in S.No. 164, in Pernamitta Village, Santhanuthala padu Mandal, Prakasam District even after approval my online application vide No. DER 012401512672 dated 18.09.2024 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violation of Article 14, 16, 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider my online application No. DER 012401512672 which is filed by the petitioner for mutation of his name in revenue records which is already approved on 18.09.2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents not to create any 3rd party interest of the subject property i.e., an extent of Ac. 0.92 cents in S.No. 164, in Pernamitta Village, Santhanuthala Padu Mandal, Prakasam District pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. SARANU PHANI TEJA 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 and 3 in not mutating my name in revenue records an extent of Ac. 0.92 cents in S.No. 164, in Pernamitta Village, Santhanuthala padu Mandal, Prakasam District even after approval my online application vide No. DER 012401512672 dated 18.09.2024 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violation of Article 14, 16, 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider my online application No. DER 012401512672 which is filed by the petitioner for mutation of his name in revenue records which is already approved on 18.09.2024 and to pass….” 2. Heard M/s. Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Though notice has been served on respondent no.5 and vakalat was filed by counsel, but he has not represented the matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the record, without going into the merits of the case, as the Writ Petition is filed for not considering the application filed by the petitioner on 18.9.2024 for mutating his name in the revenue records, the respondent authorities, 4 more particularly respondent nos.2 and 3, are directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 18.9.2024 and pass appropriate orders, after issuing notice to all concerned, within one (01) month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 09.12.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.30578 of 2025 09.12.2025 RD