Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5238 (RAJ)

GOPAL LAL JAIVALIYA S/O SHRI AMAR CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/605/2025 · 2025-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4373] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No. 605/2025 Gopal Lal Jaivaliya S/o Shri Amar Chand, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Adarwa, Marwa, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Khemraj Meena S/o Shri Kailash Cahnd Meena, R/o Village Adarwa, Police Station Narena, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur, Presently Tenant House No. 165-166, Jagdishpuri Dhawas, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur. 3. Devilal Meena S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Adarwa,jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Awasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Ajeet Singh Devanda with Ms. Sanju Choudhary for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the proceedings arising out from FIR No.106/2023 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 452, 365, 323, 379 & 308 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the motivation of the family members, the parties have entered into compromise and have decided to live peacefully. It is also submitted that the parties have no previous enmity, however, the [2025:RJ-JP:4373] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-605/2025] alleged incident took place all of a sudden because of some hot talks between the parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant verifies the fact of compromise entered into between the parties. The written compromise has also been placed on record as Annexure-2. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. On consideration of the submissions made by counsel for both the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the parties have entered into compromise so as to live peacefully, the continuation of the proceedings may be a futile exercise, in view of the fact of compromise between the parties. 6. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems just and proper to exercise the inherent powers as provided under Section 528 of BNSS. 7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed, FIR No.106/2023 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West) and the consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /40