Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010000892025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/104/2025 KUMAR CHETRI S/O SRI JOGANATH CHETRI, R/O VILL. AND P.O. GARUDHARIA, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN 786007 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECY., GOVT. OF INDIA, HOME DEPTT., NEW DELHI 110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE NEW DELHI 110003 3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CISF NZ HQRS. MAHIPALPUR NEW DELHI PIN 110037 4:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL CISF NZ HQRS. MAHIPALPUR NEW DELHI PIN 110037 5:THE SR. COMMANDANT Page No.# 2/4 CISF UNIT BHEL HARIDWAR UTTARAKHAN PIN 24940 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHETRI, MS. D J BORAH,DOLI BORA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. U K GOSWAMI Linked Case : WA/61/2025 KUMAR CHETRI S/O SRI JOGANATH CHETRI R/O VILL. AND P.O. GARUDHARIA DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786007 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. GOVT. OF INDIA HOME DEPTT. NEW DELHI 110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE NEW DELHI 110003 3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CISF NZ HQRS. MAHIPALPUR NEW DELHI PIN 110037 4:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL CISF Page No.# 3/4 NZ HQRS. MAHIPALPUR NEW DELHI PIN 110037 5:THE SR. COMMANDANT CISF UNIT BHEL HARIDWAR UTTARAKHAN PIN 249403 ------------ Advocate for : MR. B CHETRI Advocate for : appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 19.02.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The matter comes upon for consideration of the I.A.(C)/104/2025, preferred by the applicant with a prayer to condone the delay of 10 days in filing the connected writ appeal No. 49/2025 (Filing No.). The said Interlocutory application is not seriously opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. Having heard the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and after going through the contents of the application, we are of the view that the delay of 10 days in filing the connected writ appeal is sufficiently explained, hence, the Interlocutory application is allowed and the delay of 10 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the connected writ appeal is finally heard on merits. Page No.# 4/4 Order in the connected writ appeal is reserved. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant