Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52375 (PNJ)

BHARAT BHUSHAN @ RINKU PANDIT v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4423/2025 · 2025-05-01

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-44 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 Bharat Bhushan State of Haryana Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 petitioner who is apprehending danger and also to decide his representation dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. social activist an activities at the behest of private respondent nos.5 to 7 and also the prevailing corruption in his area and on account of this, they are harbouring a grudge against the petitioner and used to give petitioner has also lodged various complaints against the police officials, therefore, no action is being taken by them against respondent nos.5 to 7. It is submitted that the (Annexure P- 3. 4423-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bharat Bhushan Versus Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Nitin Bhanwala, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 to 4 for protection of life and petitioner who is apprehending danger at the behest of respondent and also to decide his representation dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure P Learned counsel for the petitioner social activist and used to raise his voice against the illegal construction activities at the behest of private respondent nos.5 to 7 and also the prevailing corruption in his area and on account of this, they are harbouring a grudge against the petitioner and used to give threats to him. He submits that since the petitioner has also lodged various complaints against the police officials, therefore, no action is being taken by them against respondent nos.5 to 7. It is submitted that the petitioner has submitted a represen -5) to respondent no.2 but nothing has been done till date Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4423-2025 Decided on:01.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of for protection of life and liberty of the at the behest of respondent nos.5 to 7 and also to decide his representation dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a d used to raise his voice against the illegal construction activities at the behest of private respondent nos.5 to 7 and also the prevailing corruption in his area and on account of this, they are harbouring a grudge threats to him. He submits that since the petitioner has also lodged various complaints against the police officials, therefore, no action is being taken by them against respondent nos.5 to 7. It is submitted a representation dated 01.03.2025 but nothing has been done till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioner ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of liberty of the nos.5 to 7 submits that the petitioner is a d used to raise his voice against the illegal construction activities at the behest of private respondent nos.5 to 7 and also the prevailing corruption in his area and on account of this, they are harbouring a grudge threats to him. He submits that since the petitioner has also lodged various complaints against the police officials, therefore, no action is being taken by them against respondent nos.5 to 7. It is 01.03.2025 VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-44 4. the respondent 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with direction to respondent no.2 representation (Annexure P threat to his life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by May 01, 2025 vinod* 4423-2025 Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with direction to respondent no.2-Inspector General of Police, Hisar, representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner and grant life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by 25 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of ut entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with Inspector General of Police, Hisar, to decide the ner and grant him protection, if any It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES , accepts notice on behalf of ut entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a to decide the protection, if any It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to him. VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-44 4423-2025 - 3 - VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document