APHC010606092023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31263/2023 Between: 1. G GURANNA, S/O. G. RAMUDU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYALA, NANDYAL DISTRICT, 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA, NANDYAL DISTRICT, 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, ALLAGADDA, NANDYALA DISTRICT. . 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHAGALAMARRI PS, CHAGALAMARRI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 6. G BALAIAH, S/O. OBANNA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. S CHINNA OBULESU VAKKAVATTA, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. G POMULETI, S/O. PEDDA NARASIMHUDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 9. R LAKSHMAIAH, S/O. BALUDU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 10. DONKA OBULESU ERRODU, S/O. DONKA OBENNA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 11. GULLAKUNTA ANJANEYULU, S/O. GULLAKUNTA OBENNA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 12. N RAVI PREM KUMAR, S/O. BERNADH, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 13. GOSI NAGESH, , S/O. GOSI BALUDU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 14. T CHINNAYESANNA, S/O. OBENNA, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 15. T ASHOK, S/O. T. OBANNA, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 16. N VEERESH, S/O. N. JAYARAMUDU, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 17. T RAMALAKSHMAMMA, W/O. YESANNA, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 18. N SANKARAMMA, W/O. RAVI, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 19. G LAKSHMI NARASAMMA, W/O. RAMUDU, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 20. D NADIPEKKA, , W/O. OHULESU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 21. N NAGENDRAMMA, W/O. PREM KUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 22. N SRILAKSHMI, W/O. RAVI, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 23. G JAYAMMA, W/O. PAMILETY, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. PEDDABHOODHANAM VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 23. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 in not considering the complaint dated 15.08.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to consider the complaint dated 15.08.2023 and initiated appropriate action against the Respondent Nos. 6 to 23 and others and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to consider the complaint dated 15.08.2023 and initiated appropriate action against the Respondent Nos. 6 to 23 and others pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G R SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:31263 OF 2023 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 5 in not considering the complaint dated 15.08.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 to consider the complaint dated 15.08.2023 and initiated appropriate action against the Respondent Nos.6 to 23 & others and to pass such other order or orders…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Sri. V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the official respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions would submit that the petitioner has not made any complaint against the unofficial respondents on 15.08.2023. He would further submit that in the absence of any such compliant, the allegations leveled by the petitioner against the respondent Nos.1 to 5 are baseless and found to be false. 4. Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum according to the law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj