APHC010020672016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1049/2016 Between: 1. G. RAMESH BABU S/O LAXMAN RAO (LATE),, PROHIBITION & EXCISE INSPECTOR, AMADALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (VIG-V), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MOZZAMJAHI MARKET ROAD, HYDERABAD. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ACB RANGE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring the GO Ms.No. 69, Revenue [Vigilance-V] Department dated 31.01.2013 issued by the 1st respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, malafide, discriminatory, void and without jurisdiction, violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and apart from violating the principles of natural justice, and also contrary to Rule 3 of A.P. Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Rules, 1989 and set aside the same. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 1291 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the G.O.Ms. No. 69, Revenue [Vigilance-V] Department dated 31-01-2013 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant LEAVE to the Petitioners herein and Respondents 2&3 in WP No. 1049 of 2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. UDAYA BHASKARA RAO(SC FOR ACB SPL PP) 2. GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP) 3. A GAYATHRI REDDY Standing Counsel for ACB cum Spl. PP 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.1049 OF 2016 ORDER: Sri S.Karunakar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.11.2025 KBN