APHC010593262024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4808/2024 Between: 1. IRLA SRINIVASULLU, S/O LATE PANDLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. M.M. VADA, SRI KALAHASTHI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SISODIYADISMISSED, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI M VENKATESWARLU DISMISSED, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. SRI BANU PRAKASH DISMISSED, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALAHASTHI DIVISION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. CONTEMPT CASE AGAINST RR 1 TO 3 AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07/02/2025 VIDE CC U.S.R NO-12488 OF 2025 IN CC NO-4808 OF 2024 4. SRI DURGAM LAKSHMI NARAYANA, MANDAL TAHSILDHAR, KALAHASTHI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act for intentionally, willfully, negligently, deliberately and Wontedly, floated the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 13.04.2024 in W.P.No. 10126 of 2024 passed by his lordship Hon'ble Justice SUBBA REDDY SATTI Garu and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI 2. The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 13.04.2024 in W.P.No.10126 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. W.P.No.10126 of 2024, filed by the petitioner, was disposed of on 13.04.2024. The operative portion of the said order reads as follows: “In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make application in Form-VIA by annexing all the documents required under the Act. If such an application is made, the Tahsildar shall follow the procedure contemplated under Section 5 of the Act and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law...” 4. A counter-affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondent. In para No.8 of the counter affidavit, it was pleaded that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the authority passed a speaking order on 25.01.2025, after issuing notice to the petitioner and other interested persons and the speaking order was communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner filed W.P.No.9184 of 2025 challenging the speaking order dated 25.01.2025. The said writ petition was disposed of on 10.04.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute the averment made in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent. 6. Thus, as seen from the material available on record, the respondent authorities have complied with the order 13.04.2024 in W.P.No.10126 of 2024. Hence, this Court does not find any merit in the contempt case, and the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 11.09.2025 TVN 264 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.4808 OF 2024 Date: 11.09.2025 TVN