APHC010667182016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 42 OF 2016 Between: 1. SRI VELLA UPENDRA RAO, S/O LATE.JANARDHAN NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O. H.NO. 26/2/1664, CHAITANYA NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. NUNNA RUPA KUMA, S/O. DASARADHA RAMAIAH SETTY, OCC: ADVOCATE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 17/1/627, CHAKALI STREET, NELLORE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision by set aside the Order dated 05.12.2015 in C.C.No.1092 of 2015 passed by the Hon'ble V Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 61 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No. 1092 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble V Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore pending disposal of the present Revision and pass such other 2 order or orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT RAO RAVULAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY 2. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 05.12.2015 passed in C.C.No.1092 of 2015 on the file of learned V Additional Judicial Magsitrate of First Class, Nellore (for short, ‘the trial Court’) wherein the trial Court took cognizance for the offences punishable under Section 295-A, 356 and 506 of IPC against the A.1 and A.2. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/A.2 preferred this Revision. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter would become infructuous in view of recording of compromise in C.C.No.1092 of 2015. 3. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and as the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 13.10.2025 MS 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.42 of 2016 Date: 13.10.2025 MS