APHC010302222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1475/2025 Between: 1. BOGAVALLI RATNAJI RAO, S/O RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D.NO.19-2-15, JANGAREDDIGUDEM (V AND M) ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VUNNAMATLA LEELA LAKSHMI, W/O. SATYA BHASKARA PRASAD @ SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, D.NO.9-2-15, JANGAREDDIGUDEM (V AND M) ELURU DISTRICT. 2. VUNNAMATIA SOMA RAVIKIRAN APPAJI, S/O SATYA BHASKARA PRASAD @ SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, D.NO.8-3-234/66/A/20, LAKSHMINARASIMHA NAGAR, YUSUFGUDA, HYDERABAD. 3. VUNNAMATIA VIJAY KISHORE, S/O SATYA BHASKARA PRASAD @ SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO. 16 NEW MARKET HALL, NEW MARKET SQUARE, DUBLIN-8, IRELAND. 4. SMT VUNNAMATIA KASTURI VANI TRIVENI, W/O KASTURI VANI ARAVIND, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, D.NO.2054/20/A, PJR NAGAR, PLOT NO. 102, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD. 2 5. DR VUNNAMATLA RAJESH, S/O SATYA BHASKARA PRASAD @SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, D.NO. 16-11- 16/N-39, 1ST FLOOR OPPOSITE SARADA VIDYANIKETHAN, MALAKAPETA, HYDERABAD. . 6. VUNNAMATLA VIJAY PRASAD, (DIED) 7. SMT VUNNAMATLA MANGA DEVI, W/O. LATE PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO. 201, LAKSHMI SARIRAM RESIDENCY, HP GAS ROAD, TANUKU, TANUKU MANDAL. 8. VUNNAMATLA VENAKTA SATYA DURGA NAGA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O LATE VIJAY PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO. 201, LAKSHMI SAIRAMRESIDENCY, HP GAS ROAD, TANUKU, TANUKU MANDAL. (RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 BEING REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI VUNNAMATLA SATYA BHASKARA PRASAD @ SATYANARAYANA) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Order dated 25.04.2025 passed in I.A.No.351/2025 in O.S.No.150/2012, on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kovvur. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.150/2012 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kovvur and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Petitioner/defendant in I.A.No.351 of 2025 in O.S.No.150 of 2012 filed the above revision against the order dated 25.4.2025 in I.A.No.351 of 2025 in O.S.No.150 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kovvur. 2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed an application under Order XVI Rule 1(2) read with 151 CPC for summoning the Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddigudem and also to produce certain documents for cross-examination vide I.A.No.351/2025 in O.S.No.150/2012. The said application was dismissed on 25.4.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the present Revision was filed. 3. The fact remains that the application was filed by the 1st defendant after completion of the evidence and at the stage of arguments. Learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs has also brought to the notice of the Court that in the counter filed by the respondents to the said application categorically stated that while examining the Tahsildar as P.W.3 has produced the documents before the Court and certain relevant documents were marked on plaintiffs side as Ex.A15 and A16. 4. In the said circumstances, as already the concerned authority was cross-examined and the documents were also placed in the suit, there is no necessity to allow the application. 4 5. Hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the trial Court in I.A.No.351 of 2025 in O.S.No.150 of 2012 dated 25.4.2025. But at the same time, the costs imposed on the petitioner/defendant in the impugned order are set aside. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 05.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1475 OF 2025 05.11.2025 RD