2025:JHHC:13051 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 696 of 2024 --------- Manik Chandra Paramanik aged 59 years son of Late. Kartik Kumar Paramanik resident of Qr. No. MM/8 Washery Road, Moonidih, P.O. Moonidih, P.S. Putki, District-Dhanbad. ....Petitioner Versus 1. M/s/ Bharat Coking Coal Limited, through Chairman-cum- Managing Director, having his office at Koyla Bhawan, Koylanagar, P.O., P.S. & District-Dhanbad. 2. The Area Personnel Manager, WJ Area, Moonidih of M/s. BCCL, P.O. Moonidih, P.S. Putki, District-Dhanbad. 3.The Project Officer, WJ Area, Moonidih of M/s. BCCL, P.O. Moonidih, P.S. Putki, District-Dhanbad. ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Adv --------- 05/01.05.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent- Authorities for payment of arrear of salary from February 2001 by fixing the basic by providing the correct monitory benefit of promotion from Category IV to V and pursuant thereto pay the arrear of salary on correction of the anomaly in the payment of salary of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a pay anomaly, however, in spite of several representations his case has not been considered; as such the concerned respondent may be directed to look into the matter and take a decision in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that 2025:JHHC:13051 2 no counter-affidavit has been filed as the case has been listed for the first time. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, interest of justice would be sufficed by directing the petitioner to approach the 3rd respondent so that he can look into the matter and take a decision with regard to pay anomaly of this petitioner. Accordingly, the 3rd respondent is directed to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to the claim made by the petitioner in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulation of the respondent-company within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 5. The petitioner is directed to serve the copy of this writ application to the 3rd respondent at the earliest for redressal of his grievance. It goes without saying that, if it is found that there is some anomaly then necessary correction shall be made by the concerned respondent and further benefit shall also be extended to him within a further period of eight weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/-