Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52344 (AP)

Mother Theresa Educational Society v. The Union of India,

WP/18168/2017 · 2025-10-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010080132017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18168/2017 Between: 1. MOTHER THERESA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, CHAITANYA NAGAR, AMALAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, SRI.K.V.V. SATYANARAYANA RAJU. 2. KIMS DENTAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL, NH-216, CHAITANYA NAGAR, AMALAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL DR. V. SHIVA KUMAR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, (DENTAL EDUCATION), NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DENTAL COUNSEL OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, AIWAN-E-GHALIB MARG, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI- 110 002 3. DR NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. BADARI LAKSHMI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY K. RAGHURAMA KRISHNAM RAJU, CHAITANYA NAGAR, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 JS,J W.P.No.18168/2017 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings bearing No.V.12017/20/2017- DE (Pt.I) dated 31.05.2017 issued by the 1st Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same, and further direct the 1st & 2nd Respondent consider the 2nd Petitioner College for renewal of 3rd Year BDS course for the academic year 2017- 18, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 22179 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to cause inspection of the Petitioner College for the grant of renewal of permission for the 3rd Year BDS course for the academic year 2017- 2018 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY(SC FOR DCI) 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 JS,J W.P.No.18168/2017 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioners. The main prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the petitioners’ college for renewal of 3rd year BDS course for the academic year 2017-18. Since the writ petition pertains to the admissions in the petitioners’ college for the academic year 2017-18, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.18168/2017 110 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18168/2017 Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS