Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39677 Court No. - 64 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40232 of 2019 Applicant :- Ankit Sachar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Pathak,Daya Shanker Pandey,Harshit Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anupam Dubey,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Harshit Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.D. Ojha, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. Sri Anupam Dubey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. 3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to allow this application under 482 Cr.P.C. and quash the charge-sheet dated 29.06.2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 28 of 2019 and proceedings of criminal case no. 1131 of 2019 (State Vs. Ankit Sachar and others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District -Gautam Budh Nagar pending in the court of Civil Judge, Senior Division (F.T.C.), Gautam Budh Nagar and further with the prayer to stay the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case during the pendency of this application. 4. As per office report dated 27.11.2024, compromise verification report of court concerned is on record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a compromise between the parties was referred for verification vide order dated 3.9.2024 passed by this Court which has been duly verified by the court concerned on 24.10.2024 and a report to the said effect has been sent by the court concerned, as such the compromise entered between the parties is duly verified and the proceedings of the present matter be quashed. 6. Learned counsel for the State admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the aforesaid case is quashed against the applicant (s). 7. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered in to compromise and have settled their dispute amicably, the said compromise has been also been verified by the trial court. 8. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 9. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicant(s). 10. The charge sheet as well as entire proceedings of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. 11. The present application is allowed. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad