22.04.2025 Court No. 2 Item No. 49 AGM Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction WPA 767 of 2025 Tinamani Roy Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Debajit Kundu. ……for the petitioner. Mr. Preetom Das. Mr. Prodip Sarkar. … for the State. 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the writ petition as the respondent authorities have already taken steps to consider her representation. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as ‘not pressed’. 3. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Amrita Sinha, J.)