APHC010010252021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 798/2021 Between: 1. G VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O SIVANNARAYANA AGE. 40 YEARS R/O VISADALA VILLAGE, MEDIKONDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU, THE COMMISSIONER OF SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU, EXCISE COMPLEX, RS NO.88-2B, SAI VIHAR APARTMENTS, POULTRY FARM ROAD, PRASADAMPADU (V), VIJAYAWADA-521108. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PROHIBITION AND EXCISE PRESENTLY SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU, GUNTUR 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI RURAL P.S., GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the Order passed by the 2nd respondent in Cr. No. 632/2020/SEB/C1, dated 23-12-2020 which upheld the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in Rc. No. 579/2020/B2/PS dated 16-10-2020 as well as the order passed by the 3rd respondent vide Rc. No. 579/2020/B2/PS dated 16-10-2020 are illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against principles of natural justice and violate of rights, guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to quash or set aside the same and to issue a consequential direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to release the vehicle of the petitioner i.e., Maruti Swift Desire Car bearing No. AP 28 CL 2367 forthwith and pass such other order 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to release the vehicle of the petitioner i.e., Maruti Swift Desire Car bearing No. AP 28 CL 2367 forthwith by suspending the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Cr. No. 632/2020/SEB/C1, dated 23- 12-2020 which upheld the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in Rc. No. 579/2020/B2/PS dated 16-10-2020 as well as the order passed by the 3rd respondent vide Rc. No. 579/2020/B2/PS dated 16-10-2020 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V L KISHORE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.798 of 2021 ORDER:- Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 28.11.2025 KBN 4 318 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.798 of 2021 Date: 28.11.2025 KBN