Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52323 (AP)

C.RAMBABU, VIJAYAWADA v. PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT., HYD & 2 OTHERS

WP/12221/2016 · 2025-10-12

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010149262016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12221/2016 Between: 1. C.RAMBABU, VIJAYAWADA, S/O KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC: SALESMAN (REMOVED FROM SERVICE), R/O H.NO:23-14- 7, GADIYARAM VARI STREET, SATYANAAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-11. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECRETARY TO GOVT HYD 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE A P STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, LIMITED(APCO) REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANGING DIRECTOR, NARAYANAGUDA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE A P HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, HYDRABAD REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MARKETING OFFICER, VIAJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the respondents Nos. 2 & 3 in not considering the case of the petitioner for reinstatement into service as Sales man as he is at the fag end of retirement as per the orders in O.A.No:18/2011, 28-5-2014 as highly arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as salse man under the 3rd respondent society with the benefits as per his eligibility and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 15321 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 respondent No. 2and 3 to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith as Sales man and pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 14699 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith before his retirement i.e. June, 2017 as Sales man and pending disposal of the of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B JAYA PRABHAKARA RAO (SC for APCO) 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Smt. Sudeepthi Potluri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries & Commerce representing the 1st respondent and Sri B. Jaya Prabahara Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3, are present. 2. There was no representation for the petitioner on 24.09.2025 and 10.10.2025. Today also despite the matter is listed under the dismissal caption, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 13.10.2025 GVK 3 38 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.12221 of 2016 Date: 13.10.2025 GVK