IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No 774/2025 a/w connected matters Decided on: 10.01.2025 1. CWP No. 774/2025 Dr. Inder Kumar & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 2 CWP No. 775/2025 Dr. Dinesh Kumar Bhatia & Anr …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No. 777/2025 Dr. Vikrant Kaundal & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 4. CWP No. 779/2025 Dr. Jaipal Garg & Ors …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 5. CWP No. 781/2025 Dr. Amrita Bhaik Khimta & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 6. CWP No. 783/2025 Dr. Prashant & Ors. …Petitioners 2 Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 7. CWP No. 785/2025 Dr. Ankit Sharma & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 8. CWP No. 787/2025 Dr. Tilak Raj & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 9. CWP No. 789/2025 Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 10. CWP No. 843/2025 Dr. Gulshan Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 11. CWP No. 845/2025 Dr. Mahesh Kumar & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. 3 Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General . Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the legal issue involved in these case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioners have filed representations at Annexure P-6 (colly) for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petitions, but till date the same have not been adjudicated upon; Petitioners would be satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the said representations in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 4 The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th January 2025(rohit)