Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52307 (ORI)

MAHENDRA PRASAD MOHAPATRA v. VIPUL GOEL, JOINT SECRETARY (ARI), MINISTRY OF MSME

CONTC/5989/2024 · 2025-02-28

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5989 of 2024 Mahendra Prasad Mohapatra ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. – Mr. Bhabani Sankar Tripathy (1) , A.Tripathy, A.Sahoo -versus- Vipul Goel, Joint Secretary (ARI), Ministry of MSME-cum- Chairman, Coir Board, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi and others. ..... Opposite Parties/ Contemnors Represented By Adv. - Prasanna Kumar Parhi, DSGI along with Mr. D.R. Bhokta, CGC (For O.P. No.2 & 3-Coir Board) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 28.02.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. D.R. Bhokta, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties-Contemnors No.2 & 3-Coir Board. 3. Mr. D.R. Bhokta, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties No.2 & 3-Coir Board, submitted that although Opposite Parties-Contemnors have Page 2 of 2. received the order dated 07.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2549 of 2024, however, they have sought for some time vide letter dated 30.05.2024. He further submitted that although he has no instruction, however, the Opposite Parties-Contemnors must have complied with the order dated 07.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) NO.2549 of 2024 in the meantime. 4. Considering such submission, as a last chance, further six weeks’ time is granted to the Opposite Parties-Contemnors to implement the order dated 07.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) NO.2549 of 2024, if the same has not implemented. It is made clear that in the event the order of the Court is not given effect to within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction the contempt petition is disposed of. (A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Debasis