Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5526 WP No. 101813 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101813 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SURYA TRADERS, SY NO.33/C/*, GP NO.9/33, NEAR GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL, PANNAPUR KARATAGI, GANGAVATHI, TALUK: KOPPAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K. SANDEEP KUMAR.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR A-WING ASHER IT PARK, WAGHLE ESTATE, THANE-WEST, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400 604.
2.
IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED, REG. OFFICE AT KRM TOWERS, 7TH FLOOR, NO.1, HARRIGNTON ROAD, CHETPET, CHENNAI AND BRANCH OFFICE, GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR, BASAVA COMPLEX HOSPETE HUBLI ROAD, HUDCO COLONY KOPPAL-583 231, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MR. SAMSON CASTELINO.
… RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5526 WP No. 101813 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Girish V.Bhat., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order of possession dated 03.12.2024 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Koppal in Crl.Misc.No.25/2024 vide Annexure-D and a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to provide entire account statement so as to enable the petitioner to settle the matter.
3. Counsel for the petitioner urged several
contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. The order is passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. Suffice it to note that as against the order passed under Section 14 of the Act, there is an alternate and
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5526 WP No. 101813 of 2025
statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the DRT. Hence, I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Because of the dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and the interim
order if any granted by this Court stands discharged.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1