MADAN LAL ARORA v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.
W.P.(C)/14124/2025 · 2025-09-12
Mini Pushkarna
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52302 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52302 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14124/2025 & CM APPL. 61093/2025
MADAN LAL ARORA
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghu Vinayak Sinha, Ms. Annanya, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Shivender Gupta, Advocates
Mob: 9910506366
Email: annanya.vakil@gmail.com
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Vasu Singh, ASC-MCD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
%
24.09.2025 O R D E R CM APPL. 61093/2025 (for modification of order dated 12th
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 12 September, 2025) th
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that when the present petition was listed for hearing on 12 September, 2025, passed by this Court. th
3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the September, 2025, the same was disposed of on the basis of a statement made on behalf of the petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2025 at 15:40:07
said statement had been made without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. 4. The aforesaid statement is taken note of. 5. This Court notes that the representation of the petitioner on the basis of which, the writ was disposed of, is already pending before the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”). 6. It is clarified that the right of the petitioner to use the rear side of the property, shall be considered by the Appellate Tribunal MCD (“ATMCD”) and appropriate orders shall be passed therein. 7. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that the MCD is allowing other people to use the same lane, which is the rear side of the property of the petitioner. 8. If that be the case, let action be taken by the MCD against the other properties also, in accordance with law. 9. This Court also takes note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD that the Sealing Order dated 22nd
10. Noting the aforesaid, the present application is accordingly disposed of. July, 2025, has been kept in abeyance in view of the representation of the petitioner.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 24, 2025 ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2025 at 15:40:07