Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52302 (AP)

K.Munaswamy Naidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/25496/2025 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010495982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25496/2025 Between: 1. K.MUNASWAMY NAIDU,, S/O LATE K.NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.511/46, KARNALA STREET, TIRUCHANUR TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PUTTURPOLICE STATION, PUTTUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PUTTURPOLICE STATION, PUTTUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. K MALLESWARI, W/O K.MUNASWAMY NAIDU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O FLAT NO.28, MATHURA KRUPA RESIDENCE, ENGINEER COLONY, ELLAREDDYGUDDEM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 6. S LATHA, W/O PRABHAKAR NAG, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.28, MATHURA KRUPA RESIDENCE, ENGINEER COLONY, ELLAREDDYGUDDEM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 7. S BHANUPRAKASH, S/O PRABHAKAR NAG, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O R/O FLAT NO.28, MATHURA KRUPA RESIDENCE, ENGINEER COLONY, ELLAREDDYGUDDEM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents, especially the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in taking action on the complaint of the petitioner dt. 13-07-2025 and 14-07-2025against the respondents No. 5 to 7 herein and in conducting investigation and registering the case pursuant to the complaint dt.13-07-2025 and 14-07- 2025given to the respondents No. 2 to 4 respectively as being illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 herein to register FIR against the RespondentsNo. 5 to 7 herein pursuant to the complaint dt.13-07-2025 and 14-07-2025given to the respondents no. 2 to 4and to take appropriate action in accordance with law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents to consider the complaint dated 13- 07-2025 and 14-07-2025given to the respondents No. 2 to 4 respectively and to take appropriate action in accordance with law and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI AKASH N Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents, especially the inaction of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in taking action on the complaint of the petitioner dt.13.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 against the respondents No.5 to 7 herein and in conducting investigation and registering the case pursuant to the complaint dt.13.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 given to the respondents No.2 to 4 respectively as being illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 herein to register FIR against the Respondents No.5 to 7 herein pursuant to the complaint dt.13.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 given to the respondents no.2 to 4 and to take appropriate action in accordance with law…” 2. Heard Sri N.Sai Akash, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are not taking any action against the complaints dated 13.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 made by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the matter is purely civil in nature that is why the police have not taken any action against the complaints of the petitioner. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV 545 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25496 of 2025 Dated: 22.09.2025 JLV