$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2979/2025 JOSEPH TANOH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Kaushik, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 10.07.2026 CRL.M.A. 23061/2025 (EXEMPTION) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2979/2025 3. Out of twenty-five prosecution witnesses, twenty-two prosecution witnesses have already been examined. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that on an application filed by the prosecution, one previous witness has been directed to be re-examined. 4. Let the trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of three months from date of receipt of the copy of the order passed today. If the trial is not concluded within a period of three months, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh application seeking regular bail. 5. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:13:37 6. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 10, 2026 tr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:13:37