GOLU JAISWAL @ SATYENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
MCRCA/1523/2025 · 2025-10-06
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52290 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52290 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:49846
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1523 of 2025 1 - Golu Jaiswal @ Satyendra Kumar Jaiswal S/o Virendra Jaiswal Aged About 28 Years R/o Beside Shiv Mandir, Shivdhari Colony, Ambikapur, P.S. Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 2 - Anubhav Jaiswal S/o Virendra Jaiswal Aged About 25 Years R/o Trikon Chowk, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, P.S. And Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.)
... Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Gandhinagar, District – Sarguja (C.G.)
... Non-applicant For Applicants : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order On Board 07/10/2025
1. Heard Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. Ankita Shukla, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State.
2. The applicants have preferred this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of Anticipatory Bail, apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No. 170/2025, RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 registered at Police Station – Gandhinagar, District – Sarguja (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 296, 333, 351(3) and Section 3(5) of the BNS.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been arrested during the pendency of the present bail application and has also been enlarged on regular bail, thus, the present bail application has become infructuous.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, the present application is dismissed as infructuous. -
Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rajshekhar