Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52289 (CAL)

SHYAMALI ROY AND ORS. v. SUKUMAR ROY AND ORS.

FMAT/11/2025 · 2025-05-01

Madhuresh Prasad, Supratim Bhattacharya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01.05.2025 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT (D/L 18) IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI (SKB) FMAT 11 of 2025 With IA NO: CAN 1 of 2025 Shymali Roy and others Versus Sukumar Roy and others Mr. Sudipto Kumar Mazumder, Sr. Adv., MrSubhankar Dutta … for the appellants. Mr. Bhaskar Roy Mahashaya … for the respondents. 1. The learned senior counsel representing the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal to file it in proper form. He further submits that the certified copy may be returned to the learned advocate on record for presenting a fresh appeal in proper form. 2. With such liberty, we allow the appeal to be withdrawn. Let certified copy of the decree be returned to the leaned advocate on record for the appellants upon supplying a photostat copy of the same, by the Assistant Court Officer. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)