APHC010635992023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32714/2023 Between: MONDITHOKA ISSAK, S/O. MONDITHOKA JAKKAIAH, AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. UPA SARPANCH, BOGGARAM VILLAGE, R/O. BOGGARAM VILLAGE, IPUR MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET, PALANADU DISTRICT,NARASARAOPET 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IPUR POLICE STATION, IPUR MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, AT NARASARAOPET. 5. GORUGUNTLA HANUMATH NAGARJUNA, S/O. GONUGUNTLA SRINIVASARAO, HINDU, AGE. 36 YEARS,OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BOGGARAM VILLAGE, IPUR MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. GONUGUNTLA RAKESH BABU, S/O. SRINIVASARAO, HINDU, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BOGGARAM VILLAGE, IPUR MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 7. GORUGUNTLA SHIVALAXMI KUMARI, W/O. SRINIVASARAO, HINDU, AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O. BOGGARAM VILLAGE, IPUR MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondent No.4 to register the report dt. 03-12-2023 submitted by the petitioner as a FIR, immediately, for the offences punishable under The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner, are of civil nature. As such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Sri P.V.S.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32714 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh