Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-2315-20
IN THE HI
131
Satish Kuma
Balraj Sharm
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
defendant P-2) passed whereby the
2.
respondent possession; injunction. Court throu 22.05.2025, her Vakalatn learned tria defendant, o stipulated pe 2026 (O&M)
-1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CR-23 Date o
Kumar
Versus
Sharma
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Raghav Taneja, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present revision petition ha ant seeking setting aside of order assed by the learned Civil Judge ( by the defence of the petitioner/defend
Brief facts of the case are dent-plaintiff had filed Civil Suit (An sion; and for mesne profit; and Initially, the petitioner had appe through counsel on 29.04.2025; an 2025, learned counsel for the petition kalatnama. Thereafter, vide impugned d trial Court had struck-off the d ant, on account of non-filing of w ted period of 90 days. Hence, the pres
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2315-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.03.2026
.… Petitioner
.... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. tion has been filed by the petitioner-
order dated 15.11.2025 (Annexure dge (Junior Division), Gurugram, defendant has been struck off. are that on 17.01.2025, the (Annexure P-1) for recovery of and for permanent mandatory appeared before the learned trial and on subsequent date i.e. etitioner-defendant had submitted ugned order dated 15.11.2025, the the defence of the petitioner- of written statement within the e present revision petition.
xure
RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.11 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
CR-2315-20
3.
to interfere i he may be liberty to th accordance w
4.
5.
6.
11.03.2026 rishu
2026 (O&M)
-2-
After arguing for some time, wh rfere in the matter, learned counsel fo y be permitted to withdraw the pre to the petitioner to take recourse to ance with law, if any.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with th
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
me, when this Court is not inclined nsel for the petitioner submits that he present revision petition, with urse to the alternative remedy, in with the liberty aforesaid. any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.11 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.