IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.78 of 2025 Date of Decision: 6.6.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Raspal Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide his representation in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition 2 with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. June 6, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge