Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5228 (BOM)

NANASAHEB NAMDEO TURAKMANE. v. DASHRATH PANDURANG SOLAPURE and OTHERS.

SA/238/1992 · 2025-01-29

Shri R M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 927sa238.92.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 SECOND APPEAL NO. 238 OF 1992 NANASAHEB NAMDEO TURAKMANE. VERSUS DASHRATH PANDURANG SOLAPURE AND OTHERS. ... Advocate for Appellant Nos. A-3 to A-4 & A-1(i) To A-1(iv) and 2a and 2b : Mr. Somani h/f Mr. R.F. Totala Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1-a to 1-e, 2 & 3 : Mr. Sanjay S. Sudame h/f Mr. Dhorde Vikram R. ... CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 26.09.2025. PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate for appellant Mr. Somani h/f Mr. Totla, for the appellant submits that this Court, by order dated 29.01.2025, remitted back the suit of the Trial Court for recording of evidence only on the point of measurement carried out as per the order of this Court passed in Civil Application No. 1960 of 2016 dated 15.06.2016 and further directed to the Trial Court to record findings thereon and decid the suit accordingly. However, pursuant to the said order, the original map, panchanama and notices prepared by the Superintendent of the Land Records, Rahata, have not been sent to the learned Trial Court at Rahata, so he urged to send the same to the Trial Court, for which the 2 927sa238.92.odt learned Advocate for the respondent has given no objection. 2. In view of this, the office is directed to send the original map, panchanama and notices to the learned trial Court forthwith as per the application dated 10.09.2025 of the learned Advocate for the appellant. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) mahajansb/