Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52279 (CHH)

SOMNATH CHANDRAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/975/2025 · 2025-10-09

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50602-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 975 of 2025 1 - Somnath Chandrakar S/o Ghasiyaram Chandrakar Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 5 Kuliya, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsli Bagbahra, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Sohadrabai Chandrakar W/o Somnath Chandrakar Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 5 Kuliya, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsli Bagbahra, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Junior Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, P.S. Komakhan, Tahsil Bagbahra, Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicants [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicants : Mr. Virendra Kashyap, Advocate For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 10.10.2025 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application filed under Section 05 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 01 day in filing the present restoration application (MCC). 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, we are of the considered opinion that the applicants have shown sufficient cause in SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 filing this restoration application (MCC) with a delay of 01 day and, accordingly, the same is liable to be condoned. 3. Consequently, the delay of 01 day in filing this restoration application (MCC) is hereby condoned. IA No.01 is allowed. 4. Also heard on admission. 5. The application being arguable is admitted for hearing. 6. Issue notice to the non-applicant. Mr. Sharad Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant/State accepts notice. 7. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 8. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of FA-154-2024, which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 31.07.2025. 9. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. FA- 154-2024 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law subject to compliance of order dt. 31.07.2025, passed in FA-154-2024 on or before 07.11.2025. It is made clear that non-compliance of said order dt. 07.11.2025 within stipulated time, will lead to automatic dissolution of this order. 10. Accordingly, the MCC allowed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge s@if