Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52276 (AP)

Adivanne Rajeswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/16751/2022 · 2025-11-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272492022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16751/2022 Between: ADIVANNE RAJESWARI, W/O ADIVANNE ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT 4-4-1029/A, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, WEST P.S, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE S I, WEST P.S, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WEST P.S. TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. M GAYATHRI, W/O M. PALANI ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-707/C, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. CHITTOOR NIRMALA, W/O C. VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT 20-5-215/A, SAJAYGANDHI COLONY, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 8. PURAM VIJAYA, W/O P. NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-580, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 9. N NEELAVENI, W/O DHAMODHARAM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-1032, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 10. B SUJATHA, W/O B. SURESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-1029/A, GROUND FLOOR, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 11. P HEMALATHA, W/O P. VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-543/A, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 12. D MANJULA, W/O D. CHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-710, NEAR BRAMHAMGARI TEMPLE, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 13. C SUHASHNI, W/O C. SIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4-4-707, NEHRU NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. M SIVA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 5 in not registering the FIR and not investigating the matter basing on the complaint dt. 28.07.2021 (C.No. 970/CCC/SP.TPTU/2021) as illegal, arbitrary against principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 5 to Register the FIR and investigate into the matter.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on receipt of the complaint dated 28.07.2021, on enquiry, Police having found that the matter is relating to recovery of money, have not registered any case. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16751 of 2022 Dt.17.11.2025 Dinesh