Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52259 (AP)

M/s R V Constructions, v. Sri Kantilal Dande, IAS.,

CC/926/2025 · 2025-11-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010177192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 926/2025 Between: 1. M/S R V CONSTRUCTIONS,, PROPRIETOR B.RAMESH BABU, S/O. DORASWAMY. AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. PADIRIKUPPAM VILLAGE, KARVETINAGARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KANTILAL DANDE IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROAD AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI SUMIT KUMAR IAS, COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR. 4. SRI VIVEKANANDA REDDY, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. 5. SRI SATYANARAYA, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. SRI SRINIVASULU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER R AND B CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under the Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for the violation of the Order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 1001 of 2024 dt.05.09.2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 926/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1001 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1001 of 2024, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 01.12.2025 TTPPSS 4 16 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 926/2025 01.12.2025 TTPPSS