APHC010000082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 212/2024 Between: 1. SRI VUDA SUNIL KUMAR, S/O VUDA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 33 YRS , OCC,SOFTWARE ENGINEER, VIRTUSA CONSULTANCY , SERVICE PVT LTD., R/AT D.NO.9-36-20, NEAR CSB BANK , RAMARAOPETA, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, VIJAYANAGARAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJAPATHINAGARAM P.S, GAJAPATHINAGARM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM TOWN P.S., NARSIPATNAM ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. SMT ARISETTY VUDA SNEHITA, W/O VUDA SUNIL KUMAR, AGED 28 YRS D.NO.6-45, DOWN STREET, GAJAPATHI NAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVURI LEELA SAI SAMPATH 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 212 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police particularly R-3 and R-4 continuously calling and harassing the petitioner attend before the R-3 and R-4 Police Station on the Complaint of Petitioner’s Wife i.e., Un- official respondent No.5 even without registration of any Crime nor issuance of any summons even though there is a dispute in between the petitioner as well as R-5 before the Senior Civil Judge Courts, vide H.M.O.P.No.41/2023 and H.M.O.P.NO.169/2023 pending for consideration, inspite of the same, entertaining the Complaint from the R-5 not even without preliminary enquiry Calling the Petitioner it is nothing but illegal, unlawful, violation of principles of natural justice, violation of articles 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents R-3 and R-4 not to Call for the petitioner to the police stations nor harass the petitioner even without registration of any crime nor following the due process of Law in the interest of the justice.…” 2. Heard Sri Ravuri Leela Sai Sampath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent-police never called the petitioner to the police station and no crime has been registered against him. 4 He would further submit that they are not interfering in the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the 5th respondent. 5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against him. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.212 of 2024 Dated.05.12.2025 UPS 295