Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52254 (AP)

GANDHULI ADAM BI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21916/2025 · 2025-12-07

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010424012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21916/2025 Between: 1. GANDHULI ADAM BI, W/O. ABDUL RAZAK, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC SARPANCH, R/O. BETHAPUDI VILLAGE, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER SE, PR CIRCLE - GUNTUR, ZILLA PARISHAD COMPOUND, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PIU DIVISION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DY EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI SUB DIVISION, TADIKONDA, GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. 7. BETHAPUDI GRAM PANCHAYAT, BETHAPUDI, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the payment for the works undertaken by the petitioner for providing CC roads a) From Bathineni Seshaiah (House) to Malka Khairunbaji (House) Covered in the M-Book No.51/A/PRI/PIU/2023-24, vide work Code PR CODE 5072-25086, for a bill amount of Rs. 2,97,972.39/- b) From Sk Mahaboob Subhani (House) to Sk Khaja Banda (House) Covered in the M-Book No.59/A/PRI/PIU/2023-24, vide work Code PR-5072-25090, for a bill amount of Rs. 2,99,556.32/- c) From Sk Baji (House) to Syed Masthan vali (House) Covered in M-Book No. 59/A/PRI/PIU/2023-2024 vide work code PR-5072-25089, for a bill amount of Rs. 3,49,440.46/- d) From Munsubgari Muhudeen Peera (House) to Sachivalayam Covered in the M-Book NO.53/A/PRI/PIU/2023-24 vide Work Code PR-5072-25086 for a bill amount of Rs. 2,82,087.30/-, and e) From Kondapalli Masthan Vali (House) to Sk. Hanief (House) Covered in the M-Book No.51/A/PRI/PIU/2023-24 vide Work Code PR-5072-25086 for a bill amount of Rs. 3,47,531,91/- for the total bill amount Rs.15,76,588.38/- under the grant of GGMP (Gadapa Gadapaku Mana Prabhutwam) funds as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to pay the bill amount forthwith to the petitioner along with 24 percent per annum and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 3 1. SHAIK MUKTHIYAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ORDER: Non-payment of bill amount for the works executed by the petitioner for providing CC roads is the grievance of the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri Mukthiyar Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for the respondents. 3. On 24.11.2025, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions dated 10.11.2025, submitted that, the authorities have admitted to pay to a tune of Rs.13,84,000/- (after statutory deductions) as against the claim made by the petitioner to a tune of Rs.15,76,588.38 ps and sought time for such payment. To the said submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions in that regard. 4. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to accept the said amount. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions of both the learned counsel and as the authorities are ready to pay the admitted amount to 4 the petitioner, this court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to release the admitted/legally entitled amount to the petitioner at the earliest and at any rate, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 08.12.2025 JLV 5 322 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21916/2025 Date: 08.12.2025 JLV