Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52237 (MAD)

T.RAVICHANDRAN v. THE REGISTRAR

WP/14722/2025 · 2025-04-25

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 14722 of 2025 1.T.Ravichandran 2. Ramani Petitioner(s) Vs The Registrar Registrar Office, Thellar, Thiruvannamalai District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in respect of Refusal Check Slip RFL/ Thellar/ 35/ 2025 dated 08.04.2025 and quash the same and thereby direct the respondent to register the sale deed executed by the petitioners on 08.04.2025 (TP/2154467822025) in respect of the property in Theyyar Madura madam village, comprising S.No.616/ 4F, of an extent Acre 01.24 cents. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Murali For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal Check Slip issued by the respondent dated 08.04.2025 and for a consequential direction to the respondent to register the Sale Deed executed by the petitioners on 08.04.2025 and to register the same. 2.Heard Mr.P.Murali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr.U.Baranidharan , learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent. 3.The refusal Check Slip has been issued on the ground that the very same subject property in S.No.616/4F has been dealt with in a document which was registered as Document No.2838 of 2012 by one Kothandaraman in favour of Ashok Kumar and Suresh Kumar. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 4.It is seen from records that the title of the subject property for the petitioners is traceable from Document Nos.1935 of 2011 and 1980 of 2011. The documents executed by Kothandaraman in favour of Ashok Kumar and Suresh Kumar dealt with a large extent of property in various survey numbers and one such survey number has been mentioned as S.No.616/4F. It is not known as to how they dealt with the property when the property has already vested with the petitioner. Therefore, the said entry by itself will not stand in the way of the petitioners dealing with the subject property and executing the Sale Deed. In any case, the title dispute cannot be gone into by the respondent in view of the recent judgement of the Apex Court in K.Gopi vs. Sub Registrar and others reported in 2025 2 CTC 777. 5.In view of the above discussion, the impugned refusal Check Slip dated 08.04.2025, is hereby quashed and there shall be a direction to the respondent to register the Sale Deed, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 6.In the result, this writ petition stands allowed with the above directions. No Costs. 25-04-2025 (2/2) Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 To 1.The Registrar Registrar Office, Thellar, Thiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/6 WP No. 14722 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr WP No. 14722 of 2025 25-04-2025 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis