APHC010645062023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33204/2023 Between: 1. MADGULA SURESH,, S/O JAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O H.NO.8-91, NEAR FIRE STATION, JAGGAYYAPETA TOWN, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT,ANDRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VIJAYAWADA, ANDRA PRADESH. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, JAGGAYYA PETA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA DIVISION, NTR DISTRICT. 5. THE CL OF POLICE, JAGGAYYA PETA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAGGAYYA PETA POLICE STATION, JAGGAYYA PETA, NTR DISTRICT. 7. VERAMALLA KOTESHWAR RAO, S/O CHINTHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC PAINTER R/O H.NO 10-315,INDIRA COLONY, CHRISTIANPETA, JAGGAYYAPETA, NTR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33204 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and interfering into the civil disputes and calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to settle the disputes with the respondent No.7 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust, violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14,15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondent Nos.5 and 6 to not interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and not to interfere into the civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to threaten him to settle the disputes with the respondent No.7 and pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of one Veeramalla Koteswara Rao/7th respondent, through Spandana, the petitioner was called to the police station to enquire into the matter and no crime has been registered against the petitioner, since the subject matter is civil in nature. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. The police are further directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in absence of any crime against him. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.33204 of 2023 Dated.05.12.2025 UPS 282