Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5223 (UTT)

CENTURION UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANGEMNENT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1097/2025 · 2025-04-30

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 51 WPMS No. 1097 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Siddhartha Bankoti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent no. 3. Petitioner claims that he had submitted 9 bills to the respondents for a total amount of Rs. 80,48,000/-, but the payment has not been made. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the liability has been denied by the respondents. The petitioner is not submitting the details of the person, whom the petition has applied. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate Forum. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 30.04.2025 Avneet/