Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52220 (AP)

Lalam Satya Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27554/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010456212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27554/2021 Between: 1. LALAM SATYA PRASAD, S/O LALAM SATYANARAYANA. AGED 55 YEARS. R/O D.NO.4-4, LALAM KONDURU VILLAGE, RAMBILLI MANDAL. VISKAPATANAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKAPATNAM RURAL. VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI TOWN POLICE STATION. VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. RANGA CHINA VENKATA SWAMY RANGA PEDDA, LATE BULLAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 26-105, COURT PETA. YALAMANCHILI, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. RANGA GUNNAIAH RAVI, S/O.CHINNA VENKATASWAMY. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.26-105. COURT PETA, YALAMANCHILI, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondent No.3 in interfering in civil disputes in respect of the Petitioner's land in an extent of Ac 0.50 cents in Sy.No.54/1, Yalamanchili, Visakapatnam District, as arbitrary. illegal and violative of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondents No.4 and 5 in respect of the land in an extent of Ac 0.50 cents in Sy.No.54/1 of Yalamanchili, Visakapatnam District, and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondents No.4 and 5 in respect of the land in an extent of Ac 0.50 cents in Sy.No.54/1 of Yalamanchili. Visakapatnam District, by calling the Petitioner to the police station, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief: “...to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondent No.3 in interfering in civil disputes in respect of the Petitioner's land in an extent of Ac 0.50 cents in Sy.No.54/1, Yalamanchili, Visakapatnam District, as arbitrary. illegal and violative of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondents No.4 and 5 in respect of the land in an extent of Ac 0.50 cents in Sy.No.54/1 of Yalamanchili, Visakapatnam District, and to pass ....” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and respondent No.4 and that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 27554 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*