Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5222 (HP)

SAPNA RANI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/664/2025 · 2025-01-10

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.662 of 2025 & connected matters. Decided on: 10th January 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 662 of 2025 Nisha Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 664 of 2025 Sapna Rani ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No.666 of 2025 Sandeep Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issues involved in the present writ petitions have already been adjudicated Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be content if the cases of the petitioners are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. 2 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024. - 3 - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 10, 2025 R.Atal