138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-2840-2025(O&M) Date of decision : 22.09.2025 Pooja Verma and others ... Petitioners Versus Tarninder Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment dated 25.05.2018 of the Rent Controller, Chandigarh as well as the judgment dated 25.03.2025 of the Appellate Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset has very fairly submitted that the documents i.e., Annexure P-14 to P-17 are to be placed on record by moving an application for additional evidence as the same were not part of the rent proceedings and has submitted that the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after giving full and better particulars. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 22, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.09.23 16:18 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment