Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52214 (AP)

VEERNAPU KIRAN KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/12139/2025 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010628692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12139 of 2025 Between: 1. VEERNAPU KIRAN KUMAR, S/O. LATE DAVID PAUL, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 4-15-41, POSTAL COLONY, GUNTUR, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO. 4-16-56/2, 6TH LANE, BHARATHPET, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, PS ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI. 2. TALLURI ANASUYA RANI, W/O. V. KIRAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. 1ST LANE. POSTAL COLONY, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. JILLEPALLI SUHAS KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.74 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District 2 registered for the offences under Sections 85, 118(1), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS. 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise between her and the Petitioner/Accused. 3. Petitioner/Accused and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement for withdrawal of the case in Crime No.74 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District pending between them. Respondent No.2 submits that, she is not interested to prosecute the matter and that they compromised the matter and hence, the case may be closed. 5. Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioner / Accused in Crime No.74 of 2025 of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur District, is hereby quashed. 1 2012(10)SCC 303 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12139 of 2025 Dt.22.11.2025 Asr