Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52211 (AP)

A KUPENDRA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14790/2023 · 2025-11-05

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010287482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14790/2023 Between: 1. A KUPENDRA, S/O. CHENGALRAYALU, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. 6/10, PRASHANTHI NAGAR, THIRUEHANURU, TIRUPATI URBAN(M), TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. INAM DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, COLLECTORATE, CHITTOOR DIST. 4. TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ/Order/ Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not enquiring into issuance of Ryotwari Patta obtained by fraud and misrepresentation to the subject land pursuant to Representation/Revision dt.12.08.2022 of the Petitioner for cancellation of same in respect of lands to an extent of Ac.1-04 cents situated in Sy. No.383/1, 8, 9 and 385/3 of Tiruchanuru(V), Tirupati Rural Mandal as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to dispose of the Revision Petition 12.08.2022 of the Petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.1-04 cents situated in Sy. No.383/1, 8, 9 and 385/3 of Tiruchanuru(V), Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District for cancellation of Ryotwari Patta and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent not to dispossess the Petitioner from the subject land to an extent of Ac.1-04 cents situated in Sy. extent of Ac.1- 04 cents situated in Sy. No. 383/1, 8, 9 and 385/3 of Tiruchanuru(V), Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District otherwise by established law pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.14790 of 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…issue a Writ/Order/ Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not enquiring into issuance of Ryotwari Patta obtained by fraud and misrepresentation to the subject land pursuant to Representation/Revision dt.12.08.2022 of the Petitioner for cancellation of same in respect of lands to an extent of Ac.1-04 cents situated in Sy. No.383/1, 8, 9 and 385/3 of Tiruchanuru(V), Tirupati Rural Mandal as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to dispose of the Revision Petition 12.08.2022 of the Petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.1-04 cents situated in Sy. No.383/1, 8, 9 and 385/3 of Tiruchanuru(V), Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District for cancellation of Ryotwari Patta and to pass…” 2. Heard Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the representation dated 12.08.2022 submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.2. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondent No.2 is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously. 5. Ergo, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the representation on merits and as per law, after hearing all the parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not beyond two (02) months from date of receipt of a copy this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.11.2025 TVN 36 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.14790 OF 2023 Date: 06.11.2025 TVN