Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52207 (ALL)

TIRTHNATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5909/2025 · 2025-07-27

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123779 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5909 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tirthnath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jagdish Pathak,Ramakant Singh,Ravindra Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner, S/Sri Jagdish Pathak, Ravindra Singh and Ramakant Singh, learned counsel for respondents. 2. During pendency of this writ petition, entire dues towards retirement has been paid to petitioner and for that learned counsel for respondents has placed reliance on written instructions. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has not disputed aforesaid submissions, however, he submits that in case petitioner is still aggrieved, he may be granted a liberty to approach concerned respondents. 4. Learned counsel for respondents have acknowledged aforesaid fact and have not disputed aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering aforesaid submissions and since grievance of petitioner has substantially been addressed, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case petitioner is still aggrieved, he may approach the respondents concerned. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad