Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52201 (BOM)

PARTHA SARATHY SARKAR v. LIVE LAW MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, (THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR), ERNAKULAM AND OTHERS

WP/3427/2025 · 2025-07-02

Shri Anil L Pansare

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

921-WP-3427-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2025 (Partha Sarathy Sarkar Vs. Live Law Media Private Limited, through its Managing Director & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. Digambar Chouragade, Counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner in-person (through VC). ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. JULY 2, 2025 The petitioner - plaintiff has approached this Court against an order, where the trial Court has refused to grant ad interim relief because the defendant appeared. The order, thus, indicates that the petitioner – plaintiff may press for interim relief. 2] That being so, I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3] The petition is dismissed. No costs. (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) Sumit 2025:BHC-NAG:6159