Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52197 (AP)

Badikatla Gangaraju, v. Sangu Bullemma, Died

AS/30/2011 · 2025-09-18

V Srinivas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010677172011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 30 OF 2011 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC, aggrieved by the Decree and Judgement in OS No. 416 of 2008 dated 19-10-2010 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. Between: Nadikatia Gangaraju, S/o. Veeranna, Aged 62 years, Business, R/o. D.No. 16-23-40/1, Dairy Farm Centre Sambamurthy Nagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ...Appellant/Defendant AND 1. Sangu Bullemma Died, W/o. Late Appa Rao. (Died) Vide Court Order dated 05.08.2025 in Memo USR No.81517 of 2025. 2. Sangu Varahala Rao, S/o. Late Appa Rao, Employee, R/o. D.No. 8-5/1-1/3, Pratap Nagar, Kakinda, East Godavari District. (Legal heir of the respondent no. 1) ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 201irASMP 131 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to - / / 7^ / / grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and Judgement dated 19-10-2010 in OS No. 416 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. / Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Maruthi Sankar representing Sri Venkat Challa Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B.Sanjaiah Gandhi representing Sri Ramakrishna Akurathi The Court made the following order: I THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.30 of 2011 JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Maruti Sankar learned counsel representing Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that he has given No Objection Vakalat long ago. along with case bundle. As could be seen from the proceeding sheet, dated 05.08.2025 2. Sri B. Sanjaiah Gandhi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, submitted that the appellant/defendant is no more and thereafter, no legal representatives of the deceased have come on record to prosecute the appeal. In view of the above circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as 3. abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR deputy REGISTRAR //true copy// SECTION OFFICER To, Kakinada, East Godavari Civil Judge(Senior Division) 1. The Principal District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri. Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Ramakrishna Akurathi, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri B Sanjaiah, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Two CD Copies Stu vna i \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:19/09/2025 \ JUDGMENT AS NO. 30 OF 2011 1 3 OCT 2B25 m# o Current tiaciio. V.V'. 5TC DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS ABATED