1 2025:CGHC:55147 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8046 of 2025 • Deepak Jatwar S/o Firat Jatwar Aged About 31 Years R/o Anda, Police Station - Malkharoda, District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Police Station - Malkharoda, District - Sakti (C.G.). --- Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Atul Kumar Gavel, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. KK Bahrani, PL. Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 12/11/2025 1. This is first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for grant of regular bail to applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.332/2024, registered at PS -Malkharoda, District - Sakti (C.G.), for commission of offence punishable under Sections 87, 64(1), 137(2) of the BNS & Section 06 of the POCSO Act. 2. Case of prosecution, in brief, is that mother of prosecutrix/victim lodged missing report to the concerned Police Station, based upon 2 which, FIR was registered and during course of investigation, prosecutrix was recovered from the custody of the applicant. Her statement was recorded and based upon which, applicant has been arrested in the aforementioned crime. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case, he has not committed any offence as alleged against him. On the date of incident, victim was major, she is having love affair with the applicant and she willingly went with the applicant. Victim examined before the trial Court as PW-2 and turned hostile. There is no any other criminal antecedent against the applicant. Applicant is in jail since 07.07.2025, conclusion of trial may take some time, hence, applicant may be released on bail. 4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposing the bail application of the applicant. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Pursuant to order of this Court, victim appeared before this Court by virtual mode from the concerned DLSA and she raised no objection in granting bail to the applicant. 7. Considering facts of the case, nature of allegations, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, particularly the fact that victim examined before the trial Court and she not supported the case of prosecution, further considering that there is no any other criminal antecedent against the applicant, charge-sheet has already been filed, detention period of applicant, conclusion of trial may take 3 some time, without commenting anything on merits of the case, I am inclined to allow this bail application. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that applicant shall be released on regular bail, on his furnishing a bail bond in sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in like sum to satisfaction of concerned Court on the conditions that- a) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court. b) Applicant shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and c) Applicant shall appear before trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-