APHC010564732012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39042/2012 Between: 1. B.JANI KUMAR,, S/O B.VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3/416, RAJA REDDY STREET, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P S R T C REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAVAN, RTC X ROADS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, KADAPA REGION, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not preparing the list of trained apprentices year wise for employment in the APSRTC as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents to fill up the vacant posts of Shramiks notified vide Notification dt.01-11-2010 by considering the petitioner in preference to others as per his year wise seniority of apprentice in APSRTC in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court orders reported in 1995(2) SCC page-1, and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49543 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to complete the process of recruitment to the post of Shramiks notified vide Notification dt.01-11-2010 by considering the petitioner's year wise seniority of apprentice in APSRTC before recruiting others in the light of Hon'ble Supreme Court orders reported in 1995(2) SCC page-1, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) 2. K V SUBBA REDDY The Court made the following order: The above writ petition was filed declaring the action of the respondents in not preparing the list of trained apprentices’ year wise for employment in the APSRTC, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 28.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today, under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 05.12.2025 SNI 3 338 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39042/2012 Dated: 05.12.2025 SNI