IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 883 Surinder Kumari State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Surmukh Singh, Advocate Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing show cause notice dated 31.08.2005 (Annexure P5) which was not stayed, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned unable to establish contact with 3. D case lis still subsists. 03.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15768 Date of decision: umari Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Sonu Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. Surmukh Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing show cause notice dated 05.08.2005 and consequent order of termination dated 31.08.2005 (Annexure P5) which was not stayed, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been unable to establish contact with the petitioner. Disposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15768-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.05.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the impugned 5.08.2005 and consequent order of termination dated 31.08.2005 (Annexure P5) which was not stayed, might not due to efflux of time, counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No impugned 5.08.2005 and consequent order of termination dated 31.08.2005 (Annexure P5) which was not stayed, might not due to efflux of time, counsel also submits that despite best efforts he has been isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.03 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document