Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5217 (ORI)

NITYANANDA BEHERA v. RAGHURAM R. IYER, IAS

CONTC/5211/2025 · 2026-02-13

R K Pattanaik

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.5211 of 2025 Nityananda Behera …. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Ray, Advocate -Versus- Raghuram R. Iyer, IAS, Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Kendrapara …. Opposite Party/Contemnor Mrs. Siva Mohanty, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 13.02.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of the order at Annexure-1. 3. By order dated 12th August, 2025 in W.P.(C) No.20784 of 2025, this Court directed disposal of the representation by the opposite party/contemnor, which is stated to have not complied with as yet. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties and such compliance could not be achieved within the stipulated period, the CONTC stands disposed of with a direction to the opposite party/contemnor to attend to the representation i.e. Annexure-3 to the writ petition and disposed of the same within the p. 2 extended period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. 5. A copy of the order be supplied to learned ASC for the State for onward intimation to the opposite party/contemnor for compliance. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Alok