(O&M) HEMANT KUMAR v. KUMARI INDIRA VASHIST AND ORS.
RSA/1990/2005 · 2025-04-24
Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52164 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52164 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203
RSA-1990-2005 (O&M)
Date of decision: 24.04.2025
Hemant Kumar and others ...Appellants
Versus
Kumari Indira Vashist and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
*****
VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
1.
The following order was passed on 18.02.2025:-
“There is no representation on behalf of the appellants in RSA-1990-2005 and for the contemnor in COCP-2422-2015. Perusal of the record would show that on 20.01.2017, Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, who is representing the contemnor in COCP-2422-2015 had undertaken to file his power of attorney on behalf of the appellants in RSA-1990-2005. Needful has not been done so far. The appellants, as such, remain unrepresented. Let notice be issued to the appellants in RSA- 1990-2005, returnable for 24.04.2025. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.”
SUMIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
RSA-1990-2005 -2-
2.
The case has been called out twice. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. In view of the above, there is no other option for this Court but to infer that the appellants are not serious to purse the appeal.
3.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(VIKAS SURI) April 24, 2025 JUDGE sumit.k
Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No
Whether Reportable :
Yes / No
SUMIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment