Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52164 (PNJ)

(O&M) HEMANT KUMAR v. KUMARI INDIRA VASHIST AND ORS.

RSA/1990/2005 · 2025-04-24

Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 RSA-1990-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.04.2025 Hemant Kumar and others ...Appellants Versus Kumari Indira Vashist and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Abhishek Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. The following order was passed on 18.02.2025:- “There is no representation on behalf of the appellants in RSA-1990-2005 and for the contemnor in COCP-2422-2015. Perusal of the record would show that on 20.01.2017, Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, who is representing the contemnor in COCP-2422-2015 had undertaken to file his power of attorney on behalf of the appellants in RSA-1990-2005. Needful has not been done so far. The appellants, as such, remain unrepresented. Let notice be issued to the appellants in RSA- 1990-2005, returnable for 24.04.2025. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.” SUMIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment RSA-1990-2005 -2- 2. The case has been called out twice. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. In view of the above, there is no other option for this Court but to infer that the appellants are not serious to purse the appeal. 3. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (VIKAS SURI) April 24, 2025 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2025.04.24 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment