Murikipudi Ratnam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/11701/2024 · 2025-11-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52162 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52162 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010230902024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11701/2024 Between:
1. MURIKIPUDI RATNAM,, S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74YEARS, R/O. AMBEDKAR COLONY, AMBEDKAR COLONY, MARTUR, MARTUR MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARTUR RURAL POLICE STATION, MARTUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not register the FIR / Crime and consequently to direct the Respondents to register the FIR / Crime, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. LEELA PRASAD MALLELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not register the FIR / Crime and consequently to direct the Respondents to register the FIR / Crime, and pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that basing on the complaint of the Petitioner given against Pentyala Jyothi Babu, respondent Police conducted preliminary enquiry it revealed that Petitioner sold the subject property to the said Pentyala Jyothi Babu, who in turn sold away the same to some others, it is all purely a civil disputes, which Police cannot interfere and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate Forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 11701 of 2024
22.11.2025
Mjl /* Dinesh