APHC010209142023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10889/2023 Between: 1. P VIVEKA, S/O P. HARIPRAKASH, D.NO.13-6-759/A2, P. K. LAY OUT, TIRUPATI (URBAN) TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, D.G.P. OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.- 522503 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, MASAPET, RAYACHOTY ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT.-516720 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAYALPADU RANGE, RAYACHOTY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.-516720 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VALMIKIPURAM POLICE STATION, VAYALPADU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517299. 6. RAVALA UTTAMA REDDY, S/O LATE R.BUDDA REDDY, D.NO.9-135, CHINTHAPARTHI VILLAGE, VALMIKIPURAM MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT-517277. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in not registering my compliant under Sec.154 Cr.P.C. pertaining to the criminal trespass in the event of showing compliance to order in W.P.No.23889/2021 and C.C.No.796/2023 related to my property in Survey No.136/2 at Chintaparthy Village, Vayalpadu Mandal, Annamayya District without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principle of natural justice and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent to register the complaint in accordance with Sec.154 of Cr.P.C. in order to initiate, investigate and remove the unauthorised structure dragged into my private property by the way of demolishing my compound wall which made my property insecure and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 181 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10889 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR